No AI

Our work fuels AI.

I have no issue with AI art as a concept, I find it fascinating, but it does not belong to the people who typed the prompts. It belongs to both the researchers who made it, and us artists, who's endless effort trained it. It is not your own, and should not be treated as such.

I don't think many people appreciate how much energy we exert on our works, on pushing the boundaries of what can be imagined. Thousands of lifetimes of work went into training these algorithms to produce these images. You have the luxury to type a sentence and call yourself creative, learn to work a little with the machine to make pretty thing

"Blue Planet ultrarealistic, nasa, 8k" or some shit, right?

This is not your work. what you've done is you've prompted a machine to select a few pages out of every book in a library written by us, the artists behind it, and make you a book. You can read the book, you can even take it home and do what you want with it, but you cannot pass it off as your own, that would be dishonest, and highly morally questionable. This forum, Artstation, is made for the writers of books, not the ones who prompt the making of compilations.

Have fun with AI, it's really an incredible tool, but it is NOT your art.